Parity builds free, peer-benchmarked reports on parking and traffic citation practices — fine amounts, ticket volume, and revenue dependency — using public records, verified with your team before anything is shared.
When ticketing revenue outpaces peer cities, it becomes evidence — in federal civil rights investigations, in class-action lawsuits, and in consent decrees that can run for years. This isn't a hypothetical: it's a recurring pattern with a well-documented playbook.
of general fund revenue comes from fines and fees in over 730 U.S. municipalities — the same dependency ratio investigators look at when assessing "policing for profit" risk.
The DOJ's 2015 civil rights investigation tied ticket quotas and fee-stacking to a pattern of unconstitutional revenue collection, leading to a federal consent decree the city still operates under.
An ACLU suit alleging an unconstitutional "debtors' prison" settled in 2016 — the city adopted court-wide reforms and estimated the changes would cost roughly $344,000 a year going forward.
A federal class action alleged the city jailed people for unpaid court debt without an ability-to-pay hearing — the same constitutional theory (Bearden v. Georgia) now used against dozens of jurisdictions nationwide.
The legal theory is civil, not criminal — these are Section 1983 civil rights claims, DOJ civil pattern-or-practice investigations, and class actions under the 14th Amendment, not criminal charges against the city. But civil exposure is exactly what shows up on a balance sheet: settlement costs, mandated reforms, years of federal court oversight, and legal fees that dwarf whatever the fines brought in.
Residents want law enforcement that's fair and visible — not a revenue line quietly funding the rest of the budget. When ticketing looks like it's driven by fiscal targets rather than public safety, it shows up as declining trust long before it shows up in a courtroom: local news coverage, council meeting pushback, and the perception that enforcement is a tax in disguise. A credible peer benchmark gives you a defensible answer — "here's how we compare, and here's why" — instead of finding out the hard way what your constituents already suspected.
Using your city's public open data or budget filings, compared against 3–5 similar cities.
We send it to your finance or legal team to check accuracy before it's shared any further.
Free, no obligation — a clear picture of where your city stands, and an early look at any outliers.
Tell us who you are and we'll follow up directly — this is a hands-on pilot right now, not an automated signup.
This opens your email client addressed to hello@paritygroup.org. Prefer to just email directly? hello@paritygroup.org